Back in July, we shared some good news out of California when a state court judge ruled that the newest regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) could not be enforced until March 2024. But last week, the agency charged with enforcing the CCPA – the California Privacy Protection Agency (with the confusingly similar abbreviation of the “CPPA”) – won reversal of that opinion on appeal. The ruling now gives the CPPA the authority to begin enforcing immediately the regulations that it enacted in March 2023.Continue Reading Delay Lifted in CCPA Regulations Enforcement
Under UK data protection legislation, individuals, also called “data subjects”, have the right to make a data subject access request (DSAR) to organisations that “process” their personal data. Similar rights are required by both the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act. Amongst other things, as part of a DSAR, data subjects can expect to receive a copy of their personal data.Continue Reading A Rise in DSARs: Why Can Data Subject Access Requests Be Such a Burden?
In a highly anticipated decision issued in February 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a separate claim accrues under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA” or the “Act”) (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.) each and every time biometric data or information is collected, scanned and/or disclosed. Defendant White Castle System, Inc. (“White Castle”) filed a petition for rehearing, seeking to overturn the Cothron decision. On July 18, 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court denied White Castle’s petition and left in place a standard that is likely to have a profound impact on the valuation of BIPA claims. Continue Reading BIPA Bellweather: Back to the BIPA Norm—Illinois Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Cothron Decision
A recent announcement by California Attorney General Rob Bonta may curtail the relief experienced by California’s largest employers who are benefitting from the delayed enforcement of the newest California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) regulations. Continue Reading CCPA Relief at Risk: California Attorney General Announces New Investigative Sweep
Just over halfway through 2023, nationwide TCPA jurisprudence is focused on further delineating the scope of the TCPA. As the dust settles from earlier battles over defining ATDS requirements, the cases from this year are largely aimed at establishing who can bring a claim under the TCPA and what conduct the statute covers. We summarize here developments since our last update, listed in alphabetical order by topic area.Continue Reading TCPA Turnstile: Scoping out the TCPA – 2023 Midyear Update (TCPA Case Update Vol. 18)
Companies that have been wrestling with exactly how to comply with the latest regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) can breathe a sigh of relief after a California state court judge ruled last week that the newest regulations cannot be enforced until March 2024. If you’re familiar with the changes to the CCPA, you know that regulators were supposed to have the accompanying regulations in place by July 2022, but failed to do so – in fact, the regulations were not final until March 29, 2023, nearly three months after the statutory effective date of January 1, 2023. The California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) voluntarily extended the enforcement deadline to July 1, 2023, but even then, many companies were left scrambling until last Friday, when Judge James Arguelles of the Superior Court of California in Sacramento County entered an injunction barring enforcement of the regulations until March 2024.Continue Reading A Welcome Delay in CCPA Regulations Enforcement
In filing a lawsuit many have dubbed “the first of its kind,” a radio host in Georgia is claiming that OpenAI, the company behind the artificial intelligence chat platform “ChatGPT,” is liable for defamation.Continue Reading AI “Hallucinations” Can Inflict Real-World Pain
In a highly anticipated decision, the Illinois Supreme Court recently held that a separate claim accrues under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA” or the “Act”) (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.) each time biometric data or information is collected and/or disclosed. The Supreme Court’s holding in Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc., 2023 IL 128004, is likely to have a profound impact on both the ability of plaintiffs to file BIPA claims and the calculation of liquidated damages for such claims. Continue Reading BIPA ALERT: Illinois Supreme Court Opens the Door to “Punitive, Crippling Liability” for Illinois Businesses
In a ruling that is unlikely to significantly alter the landscape of litigation under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA” or the “Act”) (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.), the Illinois Supreme Court recently clarified that a five-year statute of limitations is applicable to all claims under the Act. The Supreme Court’s holding in Tims, et al. v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc. clarifies the applicable statute of limitations period for BIPA claims, but does not address the critical question of when claims accrue under the Act.Continue Reading BIPA ALERT: Five Year Statute of Limitations Applicable to All BIPA Claims
As 2022 comes to a close, we wanted to look back at the most significant Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”) decisions of the year. While we didn’t see the types of landscape-altering decisions that we saw in 2021, there’s still plenty to take note of. We summarize here the biggest developments since our last update, listed by issue category in alphabetical order.
Continue Reading TCPA Turnstile: 2022 Year in Review (TCPA Case Update Vol. 17)